So, the exams are approaching. Since the academic calendar this year was more "tight" than usual, and I would not be created misunderstandings - it should not happen in the classroom has explained everything to exhaustion, but ... - Repeat the rules.
The appeal of the 28 (which, being a written test at the end of the module, which is NOT shown online) is reserved for those who have attended at least 75% of the course (ie 9). The list Students interested in is loaded as a Word file to Box.net configured virtual space (see box at upper left). So it can be controlled (and disputed, if there is reason). Anyone wishing to take the test, and was satisfied (or satisfied) with the result, can easily record discussion with the arrangements to be disclosed during the same.
Who is not satisfied, you can groped improved during the appeal of one of the 10 or 17 (these, you can book - indeed, to book) online. One or the other (for the reason that I explain below).
Or the writing of 28, you can directly support (and only) the oral 27 (registration). Again, if the vote meets all ok, or is referred to the appeal of 10 and 17. One or the other, they said. A test is a test - if it can be repeated three times in a month, which is proof? After 28
, of \u200b\u200bcourse, all appeals will be oral only.
All clear? Good luck!
0 comments:
Post a Comment